Thursday, November 10, 2005
Interrogation broke UN pact, CIA report warned
Interrogation broke UN pact, CIA report warned
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1638857,00.html
· 2004 internal document embarrasses
· White House 'Drowning' technique singled out as key concern
Julian Borger in Washington
Thursday November 10, 2005
The Guardian
The CIA's inspector general warned last year that interrogation procedures approved
by the Bush administration could violate the UN convention against torture, it
emerged yesterday.
The leaking of the inspector general's classified report represented an
embarrassment for President George Bush, only a few days after he emphatically
declared: "We do not torture." It also comes at a sensitive time when the vice-
president, Dick Cheney, is lobbying to have the CIA exempted from legislation
establishing stricter interrogation rules.
Article continues
According to the New York Times, the 2004 report by the inspector general at the
time, John Helgerson, expressed particular concern over an approved technique known
as "waterboarding", which involves strapping a detainee to a board and submerging
him until he believes he is drowning. Reports suggest the method was used on some
top al-Qaida prisoners, such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, one of the masterminds of
the September 11 attacks, who is being detained in a secret location outside the US.
The CIA is also reported to be using secret detention cells in east Europe, possibly
Poland and Romania, to carry out interrogations beyond the reach of US law. Senior
Republicans have called for a congressional inquiry into the leaks that formed the
basis of those reports. The CIA took steps to launch a criminal inquiry.
CIA officials made no comment on Mr Helgerson's report, but former CIA officials say
most agents are unhappy about the blurred rules and doubt that harsh techniques are
productive. "Americans do not join the CIA to commit torture," Jeffrey Smith, a
former agency legal adviser, wrote in the Washington Post yesterday.
The UN convention bans torture, defined as the infliction of "severe" physical or
mental pain or suffering, and "cruel, inhuman or degrading" treatment. After the
2001 al-Qaida attacks, however, the justice department narrowed the definition of
torture to the infliction of pain comparable to "organ failure, impairment of bodily
function or even death". Anything short of that standard was potentially
permissible.
The administration disowned that recommendation after it became public last year in
the wake of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal. However, the interrogation
guidelines have remained a grey area. A new Pentagon directive stipulates that "acts
of physical or mental torture are prohibited", but its only specific prohibition is
on using dogs to intimidate detainees.
A new law sponsored by Senator John McCain - a former Republican presidential
candidate and a war hero who was tortured in Vietnam - would ban inhumane treatment
and oblige all US agencies to abide by international law on torture. The draft law
was approved by 90 votes to nine in the Senate earlier this month, but the House of
Representatives has yet to give its support and Mr Cheney has launched an aggressive
effort to modify the legislation to allow the CIA to be exempted.
Negotiations are under way to resolve the impasse, after the White House threatened
that Mr Bush would make his first use of the presidential veto if the McCain draft
law remained unchanged.
====
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment