Monday, December 19, 2005

High-Ranking Military Officers And Airline Pilots Agree Flt 175 Did Not Hit WTC South Tower

High-Ranking Military Officers And Airline Pilots Agree
Flt 175 Did Not Hit WTC South Tower

By Dave vonKleist

The Power Hour
12-15-5


Startling new revelations about the 9/11 attacks were recently
released on The Power Hour radio program. Col. George Nelson USAF
(ret.), who has 30 years of experience identifying aircraft and
aircraft parts stated, "The plane that hit the south tower on 9/11 was
not United Airlines (UA) flight 175". After reviewing numerous video
clips and photographs of the 9/11 attacks, he concluded, "That was not
a commercial airliner. The planes were substituted."

( www.thepowerhour.com/news2/replay_aug8_2005.htm )

This shocking conclusion is also being echoed by other military
officers and commercial airline pilots.

Glen Standish, an airline pilot for over 20 years stated, "The plane
seen in various video clips of the attack could not have been UA
flight 175, due to the extra equipment that appears to be attached to
the bottom of the fuselage". A mysterious "flash" is also seen in the
clips that indicate possible incendiary events took place before the
planes entered the towers.

Nila Sagadevin, a seasoned airline pilot of over 20 years, examined
photos of the engine that was found at the Trade Center site. He
stated, "The engine found at the Trade Center was a CFM-56, which is
not utilized on a Boeing 767", confirming that the south tower was not
hit by flight 175, but by another plane that had taken its place.

Maj. Gen. Albert Stubblebine, US Army (ret.), an expert in photo
analysis, reviewed the photos taken at the Pentagon before the
collapse and concluded, "The plane does not fit in that hole!"
indicating that the damage was inconsistent with a 757 strike.

This explosive information not only brings into question the official
story of the September 11th attacks, but also the real motives behind
the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the War on Terror, the beneficiaries
of government contracts, and the resulting legislation like the USA
Patriot Act that was passed without review by Congress after the 9/11
attacks.

Because an increasing number of military personnel, civilian pilots,
physicists, educators and law enforcement officials are now
questioning the official story of hijackers responsible for the
attacks on September 11th , 2001, there is a call for the re-opening
of an investigation into the 911 attacks. ( http://www.reopen911.org )

The video clips and photographs examined are included in the
controversial documentary, "911 In Plane Site" a Power Hour production.
( http://www.911inplanesite.com )


The Power Hour

www.thepowerhour.com

Joyce Riley & Dave vonKleist



http://www.rense.com

No comments: