911 Dutch Treat?

911 Dutch Treat?

By Stephen M. St. John
metatron.metatron@verizon.net
11-15-5

Why haven't we seen the routine video surveillance tapes of ANY of
the passengers alleged to have boarded the ill-fated 9/11 flights at
Boston's Logan, Newark's Liberty and Washington's Dulles
international airports?

Will two lips in Holland end the 9/11 coverup?

NEW YORK -- Those who have bothered to read the 9/11 skeptics know
about the extraordinary "coincidences" that took place that fateful
morning. One of them happens to be the lack of routine video
surveillance tapes of ANY of the passengers alleged to have boarded
the ill-fated flights at Boston's Logan, Newark's Liberty and
Washington's Dulles international airports.

The 9/11 Commission simply ignored this issue even though it can be
fairly said that not only did the 9/11 attacks on New York and
Washington originate at these airport gates, but so did the
resulting invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Why haven't we seen these video tapes? Why has the Fourth Estate
failed to ask, Why haven't we seen these video tapes? Why the
conspiracy of silence?

Well, the answer may very well lie in Holland. You see, security at
some if not all of these airport gates of 9/11 was in the hands of
an American minimum-wage subsidiary of a Dutch corporation called
ICTS-International. What is most remarkable about this arrangement
is that the Dutch corporation ICTS-International was, as of 9/11,
Dutch in name only. An early 2003 check of its web-site showed a
Board of Directors consisting entirely of nationals of the Zionist
state with the single exception of the Comptroller, who apparently
was the nominal Dutchman. And if I need to clue in the clueless, the
Zionists were hellbent on finding a reason for the USA to invade
Iraq. And it would be fair to say that these Zionists of ICTS-
International were the gatekeepers of 9/11 and all that followed,
such as the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Interesting, eh?

But the story gets even wilder. Not long after 9/11, the chairman of
ICTS, Ezra Harel, whose surname is famous in the annals of the
Mossad, died suddenly of a heart attack in his early 50s on his
yacht off the coast of Palestine. Talk about not being available for
comment!

!###!

But that's not the kicker. Hours before the House version of the
first Patriot Act went to a vote, "technical corrections" were
inserted into the body of the legislation whereby foreign security
companies such as ICTS-International would be immune from lawsuits
related to the events of 9/11. Talk about not being available for
deposition! This "Patriot" act legislative sleight of hand occurred
before the inception of the 9/11 Commission when Fearless Leader
George W. Bush was still resisting the very IDEA of an investigation
into 9/11. Hence, in the face of an institutional cover-up, citizens
were denied the possibility of a discovery process which is normally
afforded to litigants. Without such discovery process, ICTS-
International would never be compelled by a court of law to give
testimony and show evidence related to the missing airport video
surveillance tapes of 9/11 or any other aspect of security measures
in place on 9/11.

!##!
The legal situation has since changed and ICTS-International is now
a co-defendant in a lawsuit in Federal District Court for the
Southern District of New York. (see www.sept11tortlitigation.com)
More about this will follow.

And so, we are supposed to believe that even as multiple NORAD
drills were underway, video surveillance tapes from multiple cameras
at multiple locations in three different "Category X" high security
international airports just happened to fail to capture images of
ANY of the passengers - the good, the bad and the ugly - about to
board the ill-fated flights of 9/11! As many 9/11 skeptics already
know, what I have just described here is just one aspect of the BIG
LIE about 9/11. Some of the answers to our national security problem
will be found in Holland. That is for sure!

But there are those who will insist that they have seen on
television video surveillance tapes of the hijackers of 9/11 and are
satisfied with the official explanation of what happened on that
fateful day.

However, these people are confused by the tape repeatedly shown on
TV of two of the alleged hijackers (Mohammad Atta being one of them)
passing through a security checkpoint at Portland Maine
International Airport to take a connecting flight to Boston on the
morning of 11 September 2001.

This Portland tape has no timestamp, which makes it suspect. Also,
even IF the tape were genuine, it does not place either of the two
young Arabs at Logan International Airport.

Nearly all Americans were lulled into believing that the Portland,
Maine tape was sufficient proof when it was not. People were
mesmerized by the repeated showing of this tape on TV and in their
emotional state did not realize exactly what they were looking at
and what they weren't looking at.

Also, yet another tape was shown in the 24 hour interval leading to
the official release of the 9/11 Commission Report; however, this
tape, released to the news media by the South Carolina law firm
Motley Rice LLC, was almost immediately withdrawn because it quickly
became apparent that it was bogus. This Motley Rice surveillance
tape purportedly showed two young Arabs boarding flight 77 at Dulles
International Airport on the morning of 9/11. But again, just like
the Portland Maine tape, there is no timestamp, which makes it
suspect. Beyond that, as pointed out by the late, great Internet
researcher/writer Joe Vialls, who some believe is really Ari Ben-
Menashe (see www.judicial-inc.biz), the shadows appearing just
outside the terminal door are those you would expect to see at
midday rather than in the early morning. Moreover, the surveillance
camera is no ordinary surveillance camera; for the tape reveals a
panning camera focused on the two young Arabs and then zooming in on
them and then moving left as they move left instead of following the
pretty blonde lady who was going to the right. Clearly, some person
unknown at some time unknown was filming these young Arab men for a
specific but unknown reason.

This Motley Rice film was never shown again because of the critical
eyes of researchers, many of whom preserved copies of the mysterious
tape in their computers.

In consideration of the foregoing, one must conclude that no tape
has EVER been shown that reveals ANY of the passengers boarding the
9/11 flights out of Boston's Logan, Newark's Liberty and
Washington's Dulles international airports.

One must also ask, if the 9/11 surveillance tapes at these airports
do in fact exist, why haven't we seen them? And if they do not even
exist, how can this be explained?



=========