CIA is imprisoning "dissenting" AIDS scientists under new law

original

On April 30, 2000, the The Washington Post announced a National Security Agency (NSA) move to place AIDS science, and all public health agencies conducting it, under the command of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). This move, curiously, follows South African President's Thabo Mbeki's decision to include the testimonies of "dissident" scientists in his country's review of HIV/AIDS treatment practices and the epidemic's origin.

President Clinton, advised by the National Intelligence Council (NIC), to
formally declare global AIDS a U.S. "national security threat," signed
this policy into law. The action foreshadows the likely persecution, if
not incarceration or assassination, of "dissident" AIDS scientists.

The CIA warned in their report to the president and press that, "The
persistent infectious disease burden is likely to aggravate and, in some
cases, may even provoke economic decay, social fragmentation, and
political destabilization in the hardest hit countries. . . ."

The study defined "instability," as revolutionary wars, ethnic wars,
genocides, and disruptive regime transitions. . . . Dramatic declines in
life expectancy, the study said, are the strongest risk factor for "such
threats to national security."

Killing two birds with one stone, promoting vaccination and medication,
the propagandist report stated that such threats and "deterioration" might
be followed by only "limited improvement . . . owing to better prevention
and control efforts, new drugs, and vaccines."

The report posted one statistic that reflected the evidence advanced in
the book Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola -- Nature, Accident or
Intentional? (Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 1998). The "number of
15-year-olds per 10,000 of that age group who have lost their mothers or
both parents to AIDS," in Uganda, the report said, was 1,100 compared to10 in the United States.

Why so many orphaned children in Uganda? Because this was the principle site of the African hepatitis B vaccine trials in 1974-1975. Uganda was the home of the International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC) that collaborated with Litton Bionetics, the U.S. Army's sixth top biological weapons contracting lab during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Bionetics was the organization that, at this time, developed numerous AIDS-like viruses under the direction of Dr. Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), who more than a decade later received credit for
"discovering" the AIDS virus HTLV-III (HIV-1).

Given the potentially grave socioeconomic, political, and now military
implications of uncovering a vaccine industry-linked cause of AIDS, future
publications and open dialogue regarding this hypothesis in the mainstream
and scientific media may be increasingly difficult to achieve. According
to U.S. government watchdog groups, and related policy analysts linked toJuriMed-a North American alternative medicine advocacy organization -the new Clinton decree empowers the CIA to act against scientific
"dissidents" who raise concerns regarding vaccination policies, as done in
this article,as a threat to US national security.The JuriMed communique heralded the likelihood of increased "mainstream [media] blackouts on AIDS dissident positions," and "global disease control" initiatives including "wide-ranging vaccination programs" becoming more coercive.

Obviously, due to the lethal nature and severe cost of the AIDS pandemic,should this author's horrific documentation be largely disseminated, and the man-made origin of AIDS premise established firmly, it would beg a global reevaluation of vaccination science, politics, and policies. At least three third world nations, including the nation of Islam, Kenya, and now South Africa, have moved in this direction.

The man-made theory and vaccine-transmitted hypothesis of AIDS is not
easily embraced. However, the implications of ignoring this hypothesis are
unfathomable. Such actions strain the ethical fabric of science, our moral
obligations as world citizens, and may be contributing to an irreversible
attack against humanity.

On the other hand, the AIDS crisis may serve an ideologically justified
function concerning burgeoning ethnic populations in a period of global
transition. In effect, it provides a revenue-generating control mechanism
for "national security" interests and the organizations, institutions, and
industries alligned with what amounts to utilitarian global genocide.